Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250E vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R7 250E vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250E
0.819 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +875%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
819.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
51.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy