Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +55%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy