Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +272%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy