Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +366%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Fiji
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy