Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 95W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
VSA-101
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy