Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (115W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +72%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy