Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +305%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
64
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

115W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy