Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X +7%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GM206
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy