CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+508%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
AD107
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Board Design
115W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA TITAN V
2
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
3
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
4
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA L20
5
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
6
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
7
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
8
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 X2
9
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
10
AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy