Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +508%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
22
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
AD107
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

115W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy