Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA A2

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1770MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
A2 +139%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA107
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy