Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (1750MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +41%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy