Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1650MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +301%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU106
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy