Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +2267%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
M93
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy