Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro S9050

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +70%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy