Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +264%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Redwood
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy