Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +57%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV770
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy