Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V8800

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +39%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
208W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cypress
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy