Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +1794%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF119
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy