Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +4204%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218S
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy