Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1440MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +444%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA100
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy