Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 101% (1855MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500 +175%
5.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1744 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy