Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1201MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +29%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1125 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Baffin
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy