Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM +469%
2.368 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1280
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
135W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
G92
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy