Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +1267%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy