Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 137% (1845MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +767%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
22
384
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy