Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV560
-
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy