Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +1819%
0.806 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV610
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy