Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +83%
0.806 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
R600
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy