Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +907%
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cedar
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy