Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1050MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +85%
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Oland
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy