Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +528%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Hawaii
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy