Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +130%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cayman
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy