Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +109%
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
R600
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy