Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +57%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy