Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +3563%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G98
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy