Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +13%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy