CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
+35%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
VS
GeForce GTX 295
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
289W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
5
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
6
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
7
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
8
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
9
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 580
10
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy