Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM +12%
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy