Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +409%
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tonga
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy