Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +513%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2016
Release Date
Oct 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
512
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
819.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
51.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU116
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy