Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +131%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2016
Release Date
Feb 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
819.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
51.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy