Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP +230%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
289W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GT200B
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy