CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+508%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
AD107
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon HD 6390
2
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
3
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 455 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
5
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
6
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
8
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
9
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD FirePro S10000
10
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy