Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1700MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40 +115%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy