Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360E vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD Radeon R7 360E vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +1265%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy