Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 450 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 450 OEM
0.947 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +1035%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
Arctic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
29.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
947.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cape Verde PRO2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy