Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (980MHz vs 907MHz)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460 +147%
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
All-In-One
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Baffin
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
3 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy