Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 48 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 48 +880%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
All-In-One
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Vega 10
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy