Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 2GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260 +18%
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M350 2GB
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2015
All-In-One
Generation
Gem System(R7 M300)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
633.6 GFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Litho
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy