Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1455MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1088%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
All-In-One
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
AD107
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy